Monday 29 April 2013


Blog Piece for www.HouseofBeth.com

 Slaves to Fashion

As I walk around the area of Sukhumvit in Bangkok, I am completely overwhelmed by the amount of shopping malls that have sprung up left right and centre in the last few years, bursting with more shops, more restaurants, more cinemas, and more beauty salons that you could ever want or need. Near the BTS Sky Train station Siam, there are three gigantic malls and a night market covering a vast square and numerous streets around. And two more malls are currently being built next door. Shopping is on another level in Bangkok – from airport themed malls like Terminal 21, to the weekend Chatuchak market with over 5000 stalls, to MBK with its 7 floors each individually devoted to fake clothes, bags, electronics, makeup etc. – not forgetting the IMAX cinema! It is a shopaholic’s paradise. But as I thumb through some hand-made silk scarves I can’t help but wonder – where on earth do all these clothes come from?

The vast majority come from sweatshops. Beneath the ethereal shopping mall lights lies a dark underworld of forced labour, mostly carried out by trafficked women and children. Thailand is one of the biggest exporters of clothing in the world. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimates that on average, sweatshops employ 61% of children in Thailand; children will work for less money, they have smaller, more nimble fingers, and are less likely to complain about poor working conditions. Many of these children are trafficked in from neighbouring countries like Cambodia, and others must work to provide for the family. Most garment workers are women, the vast majority of them young women in their teens or twenties who have left their homes for the first time so that they can earn money to send back to their families. Millions of workers, mostly women, toil in tens of thousands of sweatshops around the world. Sweatshop awareness organisations estimate that 85% of sweatshop workers are young women between the ages of 15-25.
One could argue that sweatshops enable women and children with a safer way to make money, rather than resorting to prostitution or working in a sex club. Defenders of sweatshops often bring up the fact that sweatshops at least give people jobs they wouldn't have had otherwise. However, the working conditions of sweatshops are so unbearable, they rarely improve economic situation of their employees. The trafficking of women as means of cheap labour often includes debt bondage; these women undergo slavery-like conditions, and are forced to work without wages until they have repaid inflated "debts" and "fees". Since sweatshop workers are paid less than their daily expenses, it is almost impossible to save any money to improve their lives. They are trapped in a cycle of exploitation.

Nicholas D. Kristof (in his article titled In Cambodia, Sweatshops are a Dream) talks to Pim Srey Rath, a 19-year-old girl from Phnom Penh, while she scavenges on the city's huge toxic waste dump.  She told him she would love to get a job in a clothes factory - ‘at least that work is in the shade.’  Kristof spoke to another woman, Vath Sam Oeun and her ten-year-old son.  She hopes he will grow up to get a ‘safe’ factory job as she has seen other children run over by rubbish trucks.  Her son has not ever been to a doctor or dentist.   He last had a proper bath when he was two.  In her eyes a sweatshop job would be wonderful and less dangerous for his future.

There is no single definition of what a sweatshop is. The US Department of Labour defines a sweatshop as a factory that violates two or more labour laws, such as those pertaining to wages and benefits, child labour or working hours. In general, a sweatshop can be described as a workplace where workers are subject to extreme exploitation, (including the absence of a living wage or benefits) poor working conditions, and arbitrary discipline, such as verbal, physical and sexual abuse. To keep labour costs low, shop owners usually pay workers a “piece rate” i.e. workers do not get paid by the hour. Rather, their wage is based on the number of items - shirts, shoes, socks -they complete in a shift. If workers hope to earn a decent income, they have to work hard, and they have to work long. Basically, they have to sweat. Around the world, garment workers spend dozens upon dozens of hours a week at their sewing machines to make the clothes and shoes that eventually end up on retailers’ shelves. And when workers try to defend their interests, assert their dignity, and reclaim some of their efforts are invariably repressed. In country after country, the stories are hauntingly similar.

Despite international and domestic human rights agreements, many countries fail to protect the rights of their workers, and often have a hand in their exploitation. Many Western companies are profiting from the abuse of migrant women workers detailed in this report. High street brands such as Adidas, Nike, Reebok and Levi-Strauss sell goods produced in Thailand, Cambodia and Malaysia, while low labour costs have made Cambodia a key source of cheap clothing for stores such as Gap, Zara, and H&M.

But how can we solve this problem? I personally agree with Kristof, that sweatshops are only a symptom of poverty, not a cause, and banning them closes off a potential route out of poverty. However, I also firmly believe that garment companies must disclose the treatment and pay of workers and how and where products were made. This must be monitored by in-country labour organisations to protect workers and their jobs, including paying for education for child workers found in factories and paying parents a living wage.

At House of Beth, we pride ourselves on selling only pre-loved, vintage and, ethically produced clothing.

Amelia Stewart





Wednesday 27 March 2013

The cost of fashion: H&M Conscious review



Images of child workers
Fashion is a creative medium with an extreme price range. From Primark slave-made skirts starting at £3, to Alexander Mcqueen skirts at £3000 (on sale), we are simultaneously asked to aspire to the ridiculous and supplement our aspirations with the badly made copies. I am not afraid to agree with the common opinion held outside the fashion industry, that £3000 for a skirt on sale is ridiculous. But I am also going to say that £3 for a skirt is equally so. Yes, people may not have the spare cash to buy clothes and therefore £3 is an attractive sale. But it is also an irresponsible purchase if it is not brought second hand, and it is not hard to see why. How can a company’s supply chain cost so little? How can their shipping be so miniscule? How can their store cost nothing to run and their shop workers be paid and for them to make a profit, if a skirt is £3? Somewhere down the line, someone is being exploited so you can add yet another skirt to an already packed wardrobe.

Meanwhile a skirt that is brought for £3 is fast fashion and will sooner or later end up in one of our extensive land-fills as a forsaken textile. £10 ought to be the minimum spend on a skirt, and if you can’t afford that, why not buy second-hand? Should we try to change this culture of entitlement to constant new clothes that harm the environment and workers?
H&M eco dress

Recently companies such as H&M have been trying to clean up their act with H&M conscious range. Perhaps it is green-washing after all those factory fire deaths, but at least it is a start to making all H&M products ethical. Meanwhile are these products actually any good?

I review some for your pleasure today.

This €99 dress shows H&M's foray into digital printing, Mary Katrantzou style. Opting for an easy to wear, flouncy girly tulip shape, this will flatter most figures which it should, at the price of £83.81. This dress takes khaki colours onto a whole new level of sexy sophisticated wearing, with sparkle detailing and water-colour design. Easy to wear, very on trend, what's not to love? To be honest, the price. If I am going to spend that amount on a dress I am a label snob and would buy into a designer I resonated with rather than H&M which I associate with my fifteen year old self. However it is a cool dress and if only it was £40 I would be more tempted.

H&M Formal eco wear for men, apparently.
Do we finally have ethical clothes for men?
It did take me a while to realise this beautiful model was actually a man, score one for androgyny. Yet how many men I know are on the look out for some male eco clothes! Would they be excited about this? So far H&M have brought out only suits for the testosterone crew, which seems yet another thing to add to the huge list about how unfair male fashion is. However, from a person who knows little other than the best suits are always tailored, this does look rather nice. All in all the waistcoat is €34,95, jacket €79,95, trousers €49,95, shirt €39,95, shoes €39,95. €244.75 in total (thanks iPhone calculator), which is £207.18 (thanks Google). This to me, doesn't sound entirely unreasonable for formal wear - please do enlighten me if that is wrong.

The eco Miss Havisham lace dress met modernity
Ah the little lace dress rears her head again. Well, maybe we should accept that prancing around in a 'Miss Havisham meets her modern wedding day dress because online dating and therapy now exists',  is going to be around forever. The truth is I recently had a huge clear out of my late adolescent wear and I was still unable to detach myself from a flimsy lace dress made with the cheapest of polyester and machine made cream lace that I purchased years ago in Camden Market on a delicious whim. Needless to say I have full understanding now with the whole machine-made lace lovers that are still running around, and it comes as no surprise that mainstream swedish brands are still offering us these handmade lace fantasies. However what is less understandable is the price tag. At €299, it is the most expensive item on the conscious range which leads me to believe that is in fact actually hand-made. Which does not really make sense for a mass-produced brand - so what gives? There are no product details on the site, which is odd for any clothes, especially an eco-conscious range. As with the last dress if I am spending £253, I wouldn't think H&M, eco conscious range or not, is the place to do it. As much as I am loving the 'Miss Havisham meets her lover' dress, and am actively on the lookout for one to replace my adolescent lace obsession, this will not be it.

In conclusion, there are some great items in the H&M conscious range, and we really all should applaud their sustainable chat (although quietly request that they sort out their health and safety in their Bangladesh factories). However eco-friendly does not have to mean prices which are incompatible with previous branding and product values. I welcome that eco-friendly means generally a higher price, but as with the Alexander Mcqueen skirts, we need price perspective. I do hope that this conscious range is a success and that they manage to secure some new customers as well as introducing their old customers to new ways of thinking about clothes. And hopefully they will have justifiably good sales for the above items so most of us can actually buy them.

Wednesday 13 March 2013

Global Kids Fashion Week: Should children wear designer clothes?


Alex & Alexa with their enthusiastic children & charity spokeswoman


In ONE weeks time London will be host to the first ever global children’s fashion week. It will be three days filled with fashion shows in Covent Garden. The first day will be for a media showcase and the other days will be for a ticket buying audience, proceeds going to charity 'Kids Company'.

In a recession, where the majority of young twenty somethings are job hunting and interning their youth away and the rest of the job holding population are facing larger gas bills, food bills, redundancies and pushed back retirement schemes, now does not seem like the time to invest in designer clothes for someone who will outgrow them a few months after purchase. Nevertheless this has not stopped AlexandAlexa.com pioneering the scheme.

Heralded as a playful performance of fun childish fashion, and definitely not a copycat of the adult versions on a mini body, children and stylish parents are urged to purchase a £100 ticket and attend.

Meanwhile, recession anxiety mongering aside, I wonder what the moral repercussions are for children, flaunting the latest designer clothes to their parents and parents flaunting their designer clothed child to others in turn?

I was a child at a private school with no uniform and designer clothes flaunting occurred regularly, especially in the changing rooms post P.E. When we were 8 or 9, the shrill designer clothes club would boast about their ‘maharishis’. I have never come across them since, but they were baggy trousers with embroidery on the ends (very impractical) and I was told they would cost £100-200 each. The queen bee of their gang had at least three pairs. I looked down at my baggy red gap jumper and floral leggings rather woefully. I loved reading stories and dressing up as an elf or a fairy, but I had yet to come across fashion or Vogue. My kind of childhood seemed to be disappearing, as the other children became more fashion conscious and looked at my outfit in disdain.

Mini Breakfast at Tiffany's
It is one thing to be a teenager, and have the freedom to discern your own stylish appetites, with more of a choice to rebel or conform to a fashion focused environment, but it is quite another to be an ignorant child suddenly facing feelings of shame for something they can’t control. Not to forget the large and unaffordable demands on the parent’s purse strings that occurs in this time-period. Most people do not buy designer clothes.

For people that do: can you put your child in designer clothes, allow them to enjoy the messy playtime rambles of childhood, then not get the stains out of their Paul Smith playsuit and still feel that the purchase was justified? Well-made clothes are one thing, cotton clothes are a good thing, but £230 for an every-day Burberry four year old dress is brought by someone who uses their hundreds like loose change.

These parents, who have this kind of loose change, are an elusive elite-breed, distributing their values to glossy magazines so the rest of us can consume their life-style without living it, with the actual loose change in our pockets. And while designer clothes for adults are just about acceptable, there is a wasteful nonchalance in designer clothes for a child that leaves a sour taste in our mouths, even if the children are indulging in their flair for fashion with the latest patterned skirts. While most parents want their children to shine outside and in, and a lot of children love to dress up, ought there be a moral monetary limit? Like no more than £50 per item, and even then that should be for an artic coat? When half the world is starving it seems odd to spend anymore on something that will be outgrown quickly.
'Kids cultivating a nautical look' - or is it their parents?

At Global Kids Fashion Week, children will either be the dressed up dolls of their parents or the parents will be their child’s dressed up wallet. The children may look like beautiful angels, but mess is a child’s best friend, and those yummy mummy’s princesses and princes won’t stay that way for long in their Zadig & Voltaire £88 blazers and Burberry £218 fur coats. How children, brought up highly conscious of their clotheshorse abilities, will turn out post-fashion-show – only time will tell.

Having said that, there are great discount sales going on for these clothes online. Which makes it seem almost worth it?

Thursday 7 March 2013

Why everyone should be interested in fashion. (Or at least fashion week)


Miyake, Paris
International fashion week is over. This means little to many, and a lot to very few. The majority of people may loudly assert that they know nothing of fashion and care nothing of labels, and care even less about what they put on in the morning. Although aware of the existence of catwalks, as it comes up in a trashy magazine urging the purchaser to 'get the look' by consuming the Primark equivalent, they will have no interest in actually watching a whole runway. If by chance they do catch a glimpse of a starving something flaunting the latest unaffordable odd-looking creation, they will be instantly turned off. They will think: that does not relate to me, perhaps that relates to an art student come fashion blogger living in Shoreditch or a fashionista/oil princess living in Chelsea, but those clothes are nothing to do with me, what I wear or how I present myself to the world. 

Of course this is wrong because these catwalks will filter down into the mass-made mid-range circuits in a years’ time, and in two years the very same public will be coveting those styles with a disinterested enthusiasm. They may have no flair or style to speak of, but if they shop in Primark, Topshop, H&M and Zara regularly, they will more often then not, be just as much of a clone to a mass-produced catwalk inspired style as a Shoreditch fashionista with huge glasses, an over-sized denim jacket with a vintage jumper and an ironic watch.

It is the Devil Wears Prada scenario – a young beautiful intelligent non-fashion orientated woman begins working to a fashion house – and believes that she has nothing to do with this whole fashion world (as if that would ever happen). Meryl Streep puts her straight. 

Meanwhile catwalk fashion is an elitist’s game, and many spend much to conquer it. However, I would like to contest that fashion is not only for the elite despite the elite price tag.
Catwalk fashion is art on a body, it is style inspiration and above all it is a story of humanity and culture. In my ideal world everyone would dress like they are on a catwalk, but that is because I intensely love art, stories and decoration. I do think that whatever your uniform, whether you covet basics: jeans & t-shirt combos, uggs or hot-pants with tights (so naughties) catwalks can inspire you and inject a moment of hedonistic excitement when you create your morning ensemble.

These are my favourite inspiring catwalk looks this season!

Prada's latest ready to wear in Milan
Prada celebrates woman's sexuality in the work space. Tight clothes are flattering, pencil/midi skirts are all the rage and off the shoulder has never looked so appealing.
For a great midi skirt for work try our Jigsaw skirt for £17

















Valentino's latest ready to wear in Paris
Collars, collars, collars. They have been filtering their way down to the masses - and the must-have motif is here to stay. Valentino is now obsessed and I love how it can give a professional edge to a floaty dress or jazz up a basic high necked blouse. Fancy a collar? Try one of our collars handmade!















Chanel, New York
The Chanel catwalk was full of tweed ensembles with leather leggings meets shoes, and black feathers head-pieces - it shouldn't have worked - but it did. Karl Largerfeld transformed these motifs to make a gothic meets lady-like statement. Scary yet demure, how 'Devil Wears Prada' is that! Karl also reinvents off-the-shoulder- structured with layers so the illusion of a flattering off-the-shoulder exists, while still keeping warm during the winter months. This dress, with the right layers, will get you your off-the-shoulder fix. Team with black fake leather leggings for Karl inspired styling. 







Burberry, London
The pencil skirts reigns supreme during Burberry. As does metallic and brown. The earthy browns are just pink enough to challenge 'boring brown nausea', managing to be skin complimenting, flattering and dazzling us with it's shiny texture. Fancy a Burberry Mac without the Burberry price tag? We have that Burberry Mac here.



















Antonio Marras inspired by Bloomsbury
Everyone that truly knows me, knows I am very much inspired by the iconic aesthetic of the Bloomsbury group, especially Virginia Woolf. Which is why I was so excited when I saw Antonio Marras and Cynthia Rowley's latest fashion offerings. The shapes, silk and prints were exquisite and made Bloomsbury 21st century wearable. If you fancy a bit of Bloomsbury style yourself, why not check out our collection?


















Armani's latest Milan Catwalk
While we're on the subject of 1920s, be inspired by Armani's latest catwalk. Mohair, turbans and cloche hats. Fancy a 1920s hat yourself? Try our Sandra Philipps version.




















By Rosalind Kendal

Monday 25 February 2013

London Fashion Week: Street Style

One of our favourite up and coming photographers, who captured the crowds at our event: Fashion for Freedom, has shared with us a delightful set of street style shots from London Fashion Week. Tom Selmon's photographs show us how everyone can get involved with their inner creative flair during London Fashion Week and we love how these images helps us identify new trends on the horizon, or already in your wardrobe!



Prada Catwalk 2013
The Prada sleeve - just featured on the runway - already a street style hit - as captured by Tom this week! Albeit slightly impractical, nevertheless we love it.
Cuffs on the street at London Fashion Week

Armani Catwalk 2013
We love the 1920s! And with Downton taking in their first flapper girl and The Great Gatsby on its way - designers such as Marras and Armani have taken note, from Bloomsbury to cloche flapper hats. We already love turbans and can't wait for more 1920s apparel to come to our stores.

Some are ahead of the game, showcasing 1920s turbans during LFW

Love it or hate it, fur is back on the map, thanks to Fendi's latest catwalk debut. With an Aztec meets punk style rather than an old-school 1950s glamour, fur is given a tribal make-over. Get involved with zebra prints, and straight lined jackets - but keep it simple. The beauty of the Fendi show was it's ability to keep it classy by combining fur with neutral basics.

Zebra print on sloane street during LFW

Mulberry show 2013

The trend of sleeves, alternately coloured to the body of the coat, remains on the catwalks and the streets. Cheering up london's mass of black and grey jackets without being garish or OTT, these sleeves will likely remain for seasons yet to come. Mulberry has taken it to a patterned english heritage level, while Burberry has brought it to the new metallic sweet-wrapper styled mac.

A model outside Tom Ford Catwalk wearing the latest trend

Want to see more exciting Street Style photos? Have a look at Tom Selmon's website full of London Fashion Week's finest.

By Rosalind Kendal